xanush:

tr-ibal:

I will keep this photo posted for 1 week.
Every time someone Reblogs this photo I will donate 10 cent to charity: water
After the money is donated I will post proof of donation.
Show you care & Reblog.
always

If you don’t reblog this at least once you’re a joke.

xanush:

tr-ibal:

I will keep this photo posted for 1 week.

Every time someone Reblogs this photo I will donate 10 cent to charity: water

After the money is donated I will post proof of donation.

Show you care & Reblog.

always

If you don’t reblog this at least once you’re a joke.

(Source: charitywaterproject, via playdoll)

gruvia-nalu-dreamer:

n-a-d-h-i-e:

Because somewhere in Earthland there is a farm full of Jellals and they each have different markings so to set them apart from each other. They have to fight each other until only one is left. The original one. Kinda like the Hunger Games but everyone is Jellal.

LOVE THIS! Hahahahahahhahahahahahahahaha!! Can’t stop laughing! Good one!

I want to be the very best. like no Jellal ever was

(via siddiekitty)

siddiekitty:

amerlcanapparel:

google is great because you can ask something really obvious and nobody has to know

Except the NSA

And your friends, because Google will ask your friends to recommend things to you if you search them. it’s part of the Google/Facebook/Youtube integration 

thecutestofthecute:

Puppies with pacifiers

(via halloweenbaby23)

hogwartsisbiggerontheinside:

totallynotdead:

deneuveing:

John Green implying its risky moves by telling stories about women. Because nobody cares and this “folk hero” is our savior by doing the impossible. Fuck off John Green. You male savior ding dong

Stop making villains out of people that aren’t the problem. What he’s saying is that according to the massively close-minded and bigoted film industry, female leads aren’t as “universally appealing” as male leads. John Green is pointing out the obvious about society’s misogyny, not about his own.He’s pointing out that society by and large considers female leads as unappealing to males, but considers male leads equally appealing to men and women. Don’t get pissed at him for telling a sad truth of the film industry; get pissed at the film industry for being about three centuries behind. don’t shoot the fucking messenger. 

^^^^^^^^

Actually, by large female leads are considered appealing to males, but not females. If we look at movies with female leads you get 3 big categories; cartoons with large child audiences, Young adult books turned to film, with a large teenage girl  audience (usually not for the lead i.e. twilight),  and  Strong female actions with a large demographic of male fans.  The misogyny is real, but it isn’t men doing it,  Its the women. A man will watch a movie with a strong female lead dozens of times, for the story, for the boobs, for many reasons,  but women will either watch it because “strong female role model”  or  boycott it because “Sexualization of women”.   Even in misogyny a man would rather watch a woman run around half naked than another man, the reason female leads are undesirable is because women will not watch a female lead if she is too sexy, aggressive, or powerful 

hogwartsisbiggerontheinside:

totallynotdead:

deneuveing:

John Green implying its risky moves by telling stories about women. Because nobody cares and this “folk hero” is our savior by doing the impossible. Fuck off John Green. You male savior ding dong

Stop making villains out of people that aren’t the problem. What he’s saying is that according to the massively close-minded and bigoted film industry, female leads aren’t as “universally appealing” as male leads. John Green is pointing out the obvious about society’s misogyny, not about his own.He’s pointing out that society by and large considers female leads as unappealing to males, but considers male leads equally appealing to men and women. Don’t get pissed at him for telling a sad truth of the film industry; get pissed at the film industry for being about three centuries behind. don’t shoot the fucking messenger. 

^^^^^^^^

Actually, by large female leads are considered appealing to males, but not females. If we look at movies with female leads you get 3 big categories; cartoons with large child audiences, Young adult books turned to film, with a large teenage girl  audience (usually not for the lead i.e. twilight),  and  Strong female actions with a large demographic of male fans.  The misogyny is real, but it isn’t men doing it,  Its the women. A man will watch a movie with a strong female lead dozens of times, for the story, for the boobs, for many reasons,  but women will either watch it because “strong female role model”  or  boycott it because “Sexualization of women”.   Even in misogyny a man would rather watch a woman run around half naked than another man, the reason female leads are undesirable is because women will not watch a female lead if she is too sexy, aggressive, or powerful 

(via siddiekitty)

white cishet dude: my story is a radical departure from its genre because a thin white cishet girl kisses a thin white cishet boy first - it’s pretty amazing if i do say so myself. i mean, i can’t think of a time anything this feminist happened in the history of ever

There are some major fucking problems with this. 

1. The person who wrote this claims to be a feminist,  in their own name infact, but not only insults males, but also insults females for being comfortable with their gender.  insulting females isn’t very feminist is it?

2.  Why on earth would a white male, born a male and comfortable with that, give two shits about it being a feminist, racist, or any ist thing.   They wouldn’t, they would just be telling the story.

3. Since when has being Cis or trans had anything to do with being a feminist,   those are two completely different issues.

4. If the author is a Cis, he would never, under any circumstances formally identify his characters as being Cis, and absolutely would never call them Cis scum. In fact 90% of the Cis community doesn’t know what the word Prefix Cis even means, It’s a pointless addition to a word that would be understood already,  proven by the fact that trans needs to be highlighted  when comparing to the norm.

(Source: theroguefeminist, via siddiekitty)

kavaeric:



are you even trying

well technically, calories and grams are different but at the same time, they aren’t the same type of protein and your body needs both or organs will start to shut down.   that and a serving of beef is like 85 grams and a serving of broccoli is 148 grams but  as you can see,   1/4lb of beef has 250 calories, whereas you’d need to eat a whole fucking pound of god damn broccoli to make 100 calories.   I like broccoli as well as the next guy,  but i’d rather eat a cheeseburger than a chunk of broccoli the size of a GD cat any day of the week.

kavaeric:

image

image

are you even trying

well technically, calories and grams are different but at the same time, they aren’t the same type of protein and your body needs both or organs will start to shut down.   that and a serving of beef is like 85 grams and a serving of broccoli is 148 grams but  as you can see,   1/4lb of beef has 250 calories, whereas you’d need to eat a whole fucking pound of god damn broccoli to make 100 calories.   I like broccoli as well as the next guy,  but i’d rather eat a cheeseburger than a chunk of broccoli the size of a GD cat any day of the week.

(Source: butterflygrace, via siddiekitty)

sextblogger:

there’s too many labels for sexuality like fuck just go for who you like

Sexuality is already a flaws concept. no one Male/Female is attracted to every Male/Female out there.  We have very specific likes and dislikes, a man could find a 10/10 smoking hot babe, undesirable because of the shape of her nose, or a woman could find a 10/10 gorgeous studmuffin unattractive because his voice is 2 or 3 notes sharper or flatter than she likes.  Human sexuality is so fine pointed that “I’m into Males, Female, Animals, toys, Robots, loafs of bread, Etc.”  could never define what is attractive to you.   

I’m so tired of sites with the specific ” I’m a ____ looking for a ____”  or  ” I’m a ___ interested in ____ ” , because I am a Male interested in Females, but I am only physically attracted to less than 01.0% of all females in the world.  Last time I checked saying I’m not interested in 99% of somethings, means I don’t want it. If I didn’t like 99% of a movie that means I didn’t like it.

(via siddiekitty)

these-lumping-lumps:

Somebody posted these all around school, and now I know what it feels like to be proud of ones school.

But, they will kick a boy out if his boxers are showing, or if his shorts are to short.    boys aren’t more entitled, it’s just that the dogma prevents boys from making that mistake most of the time.    If we are going to call this sexism and entitlement, we should also talk about how boys who bump into a girl in the hall are expelled and prosecuted for sexual harassment or attempted rape, for literally just bumping into a girls shoulder in the hall, But at the same time a girl bumping into a guy, nothing happens.  I mean at least a boy will get sent home for breaking the dress code,  but a girl could physically rape a boy in the hall and it would be the boys fault.

these-lumping-lumps:

Somebody posted these all around school, and now I know what it feels like to be proud of ones school.

But, they will kick a boy out if his boxers are showing, or if his shorts are to short.    boys aren’t more entitled, it’s just that the dogma prevents boys from making that mistake most of the time.    

If we are going to call this sexism and entitlement, we should also talk about how boys who bump into a girl in the hall are expelled and prosecuted for sexual harassment or attempted rape, for literally just bumping into a girls shoulder in the hall, But at the same time a girl bumping into a guy, nothing happens.  I mean at least a boy will get sent home for breaking the dress code,  but a girl could physically rape a boy in the hall and it would be the boys fault.

(via big-cake-filled-belly)

As cool as this is, it should be noted.

PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, BOB, BUDDHA, ALLAH AND ALL THAT IS HOLY, SACRED, OR DEVINE (or that is, is,  if you do not believe in a higher power)  DO NOT DO THIS IF THE PERSON HAS, OR IF YOU DO NOT KNOW IF THEY HAVE ALLERGIES.


thank you

As cool as this is, it should be noted.

PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, BOB, BUDDHA, ALLAH AND ALL THAT IS HOLY, SACRED, OR DEVINE (or that is, is,  if you do not believe in a higher power)  DO NOT DO THIS IF THE PERSON HAS, OR IF YOU DO NOT KNOW IF THEY HAVE ALLERGIES.

thank you

(Source: c0nfus, via playdoll)